<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">CEIP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Curriculum Education Innovation and Practice</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>3067-204X</issn><eissn>3067-2058</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Technology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/CEIP.2025030022</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>岗位能力与劳动素养融合导向的高职实训课程考核评价研究—— 以《供配电技术实训》为例</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/CEIP/1/3/10.61369/CEIP.2025030022</url><author>张志娟,苏龙嘎,李丹洋</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-06-20</published-time></date></history><abstract>针对高职实训课程评价中职业导向性不足、劳动素养评价缺失等问题，以《供配电技术实训》课程为例，构建了"岗位能力与劳动素养融合"的全过程追踪式评价体系。该体系基于多元评价理论和劳动教育理论，创新性地将企业隐性劳动要求转化为5维度17项可量化指标，设计"五维五级"劳动素养评价模型。通过开发信息化工具实现过程性数据动态采集。实证研究表明，新体系显著提升了学生岗位胜任力(技能达标率提升21.3%)和劳动素养(责任意识增长32%)，为高职实训教学评价改革提供了可推广的实践路径。</abstract><keywords>岗位能力,劳动素养,高职教育,实训课程,全过程评价,供配电技术</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1] 教育部.《职业教育提质培优行动计划（2020 &amp;mdash;2023 年）》[Z].2020.[2] Kirkpatrick D. Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels[M]. Berrett-Koehler, 2019.[3] 李强. 高职实训课程过程性评价的困境与突破[J].中国职业技术教育,2022(11):45-49.[4] Schmidt H. Dual Vocational Education System in Germany: Best Practices[J]. TVET@Asia, 2021(17):1-15.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
