<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SSSD</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Scientific and Social Sustainable Development</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>3066-8964</issn><eissn>3066-8980</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Technology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/SSSD.2025160028</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>研究生学习参与的内涵、价值及其提升路径研究</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/SSSD/1/16/10.61369/SSSD.2025160028</url><author>陈佳</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>16</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-10-28</published-time></date></history><abstract>学习参与是保障研究生教育质量与激发创造力的关键心理变量。本文梳理了学习参与理论从行为单维向行为、情感、认知与能动性四维融合的演进过程，结合研究生教育的高阶性与研究性特征，深化了其多维结构内涵。研究表明，学习参与通过构建创造性思维的&amp;ldquo;训练场&amp;rdquo;、提供创新动机的&amp;ldquo;心理能量&amp;rdquo;与促成创新行为，在创造力培养中发挥核心作用。四个维度相互关联，共同构成支撑研究生创新能力发展的心理生态系统。基于理论分析与现实考察，本文从课程教学改革、师生互动机制优化、学术生态建设与评价体系创新四个层面，系统构建了提升研究生学习参与度的实践路径，为推动研究生教育实现从&amp;ldquo;资源投入&amp;rdquo;到&amp;ldquo;心理投入&amp;rdquo;的范式转变提供理论参考。</abstract><keywords>学习参与,研究生教育,创造力培养,教育质量,能动性参与</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1] 中华人民共和国教育部. (2025). 2024 年全国教育事业发展统计公报. 教育部网站. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_fztjgb/[2]Kaggwa, M. M., Najjuka, S. M., Ashaba, S., Mamun, M. A., Van Damme-Ostapowicz, K., &amp;amp; Griffiths, M. D. Prevalence of burnout among postgraduate medical trainees:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Frontiers in Public Health,2021, 9, 694601.[3]Nature PhD Survey. PhD students face mental health challenges[J]. Nature, 2019, 575(7782): 403&amp;ndash;406.[4]Astin, A. W. Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education[J]. Journal of College Student Personnel, 1984, 25(4): 297&amp;ndash;308.[5]Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., &amp;amp; Paris, A. H. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence[J]. Review of Educational Research,2004, 74(1):59&amp;ndash;109.[6]Tyler, R. W. The school curriculum[J]. University of Chicago Press.1985.[7]Newmann, F. M. (Ed.). Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools[J]. Teachers College Press.1992.[8]Reeve, J. How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement[J]. Journal of Educational Psychology,2013, 105(3): 579&amp;ndash;595.[9]Csikszentmihalyi, M. Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention[J]. HarperCollins.1996.[10]Li, S., Zhang, Q., &amp;amp; Chen, H. The effect of mindfulness on the promotion of graduate students' scientific research creativity: The chain mediating role of flow experienceand creative self-efficacy[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2024, 12(3), 24.[11]Han, J., Liu, Y., &amp;amp; Wang, X. Graduate students' perceived supervisor support and innovative behavior: The mediation effect of creative self-efficacy[J]. Frontiers inPsychology, 2022, 13, 875266.[12]Shen, X. The practice of project-based learning in a management information systems course for graduate students[J]. Higher Education Research, 2024, 9(6), 11&amp;ndash;22.[13]Zhang, S., Li, C., &amp;amp; Unger, D. L. International doctoral students' sense of belonging, mental toughness, and psychological well-being[J]. Journal of Comparative &amp;amp;International Higher Education, 2022, 14(2): 138&amp;ndash;151.[14]Yi, S. Sense of belonging, academic self-efficacy and hardiness in postgraduate students[J]. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2024, 55(3), e13421.[15]Sun, J. The effective paradigm for quality assessment in professional degree graduate student cultivation[J]. Studies in Educational Development, 2023, 11(6), 45&amp;ndash;57.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
