<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Society and Economy</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2995-4959</issn><eissn>2995-4975</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Technology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/SE.2026010041</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>创业团队专业协同合作对团队绩效之影响：商业模式创新的关键中介角色</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/SE/4/1/10.61369/SE.2026010041</url><author>张智明</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-01-20</published-time></date></history><abstract>本研究旨在探讨创业团队内部之专业协同合作如何影响团队绩效，并进一步分析商业模式创新在其中所扮演的中介角色。采用理论导向与定性分析方法，以现有学术文献为基础构建研究架构，并透过文献比较与理论整合辨识核心变项之间的关系。本研究从知识整合理论、社会资本理论与创新扩散理论出发，提出专业协同合作能促进商业模式创新，进而提升团队绩效之假设模型，研究结果有助于深化创业团队合作机制的理论理解。</abstract><keywords>创业团队,专业协同合作,商业模式创新,团队绩效</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1]Klotz, A. C., Hmieleski, K. M., Bradley, B. H., &amp;amp; Busenitz, L. W. New venture teams: A review of the literature and roadmap for future research[J]. Journal of Management, 2020,46(1),186-220.[2]Lazar, S., Paul, H., &amp;amp; Agarwal, R. Entrepreneurial team dynamics and new venture performance: A review and research agenda[J]. Small Business Economics, 2020,54(1), 1-24.[3]Rosing, K., Frese, M., &amp;amp; Bausch, A. Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership&amp;ndash;innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2022,47(1),1-23.[4]Grant, R. M. Knowledge-based view: Toward a theory of knowledge integration[J]. California Management Review, 2019,61(2), 56-71.[5]Mu&amp;ntilde;oz-Bull&amp;oacute;n, F., S&amp;aacute;nchez-Bueno, M. J., &amp;amp; Vos-Saz, A. The influence of team heterogeneity on entrepreneurial success[J]. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2020,16(3),1061-1086.[6]Kammerlander, N., K&amp;ouml;nig, A., &amp;amp; Richards, M. Why do incumbents respond heterogeneously to disruptive innovations? The interplay of domain identity and role identity[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2021,58(4), 1017-1049.[7]Stam, W., Arzlanian, S., &amp;amp; Elfring, T. Social capital of entrepreneurs and small firm performance: A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2020,35(3).[8]Foss, N. J., &amp;amp; Saebi, T. Business models and business model innovation: Between wicked and paradigmatic problems[J]. Long Range Planning,2019, 52(3).[9]Wirtz, B. W., Pistoia, A., Ullrich, S., &amp;amp; G&amp;ouml;ttel, V. Business models: Origin, development and future research perspectives[J]. Long Range Planning, 2020,53(1).[10]Teece, D. J. Business models and dynamic capabilities[J]. Long Range Planning, 2020,53(2).[11]Clauss, T., Abebe, M., Tangpong, C., &amp;amp; Hock, M. Strategic agility, business model innovation, and firm performance: An empirical investigation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2021,68(3),767-784.[12]Cornelissen, J. Developing propositions, a process model, or a typology? Addressing the challenges of writing theory without a boilerplate[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2017,42(1),1-9.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
