<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Society and Economy</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2995-4959</issn><eissn>2995-4975</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Technology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/SE.2025110036</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>中日媒体对福岛核污水排海健康风险的报道比较研究</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/SE/3/11/10.61369/SE.2025110036</url><author>张珊珊</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>11</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-11-20</published-time></date></history><abstract>2023年8月24日，日本福岛核电站启动核污水排放入海，引发国际社会对公共健康安全的高度关切。在危机情境中，公众高度依赖主流媒体获取健康信息，然而主流媒体在危机期间及之后如何报道和构建健康议题框架的研究仍显不足。基于语料库方法和肯尼斯&amp;middot;伯克的"语言即象征行动"理论，对日本两家报社和中国两家报社为期一年的报道进行量化内容分析，以考察和比较两国媒体对健康议题的关注程度及其呈现方式。研究结果显示，中国媒体比日本媒体更倾向于关注危机引发的健康问题，但两国媒体均未能对健康议题给予充分重视。</abstract><keywords>核污水排海,中日媒体,健康议题,象征行动理论</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1] Glik, D. C. (2007). Risk Communication for Public Health Emergencies. Annual Review of Public Health, 28(1), 33&amp;ndash;54. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144123[2] Quarantelli, E. L.The Role of the Mass Communication System in Natural and Technological Disasters and Possible Extrapolation to Terrorism Situations. Risk Management,2002,4(4), 7&amp;ndash;21. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240130[3] Greiner, A. L., Lagasse, L. P., Neff, R. A., Love, D. C., Chase, R., Sokol, N., &amp;amp; Smith, K. C. Reassuring or Risky: The Presentation of Seafood Safety in the Aftermath of the British Petroleum Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. American Journal of Public Health, 2013,,103(7), 1198&amp;ndash;1206. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.301093[4] 武琼,柳扬,刘孟晖.&amp;ldquo;蓝色粮仓&amp;rdquo;何以为继:海洋核污染下的粮食安全现状、挑战及对策[J].农业经济问题,2024(9):119-130.[5] Wu, W., &amp;amp; Gong, J.Study on the International Law of Japan&amp;rsquo;s Discharging Contaminated Water from the Nuclear Accident into the Sea*. Pacific Focus, 2023,38(2), 159-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/pafo.12226[6] 吴俊文,陈吉生,赵化德,等.福岛第一核电站事故及核污水排海进入中国海路径及其影响[J].海洋科学,2022(6):135-144.[7] 张寅,王宏俐,梁琳琳.日本主流媒体对福岛核污水排海行为的话语建构[J].中国外语,2024(6):42-49.[8] 刘书凝,王宏俐,卢可,等.俄罗斯主流媒体的&amp;ldquo;中国观&amp;rdquo;[J].情报杂志,2021(10):38-44.[9] Burke, K. (1966). Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. Univ of California Press.[10] Wilkin, H. A., Jung, J.-Y., &amp;amp; Tannebaum, M. Comparing Japanese and U.S. reporting of health risks stemming from the 2011 Japan triple catastrophe. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2025,130, 105855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105855[11] Onishi, N., &amp;amp; Fackler, M. (2011, August). Japan held nuclear data, Leaving Evacuees in Peril 8. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/09/world/asia/09japan.html.[12] World Nuclear Association. (2015). Nuclear radiation and health effects. http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Safety-and-Security/Radiation-andHealth/NuclearRadiation-and-Health-Effects/.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
