<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RTED</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research on Teacher Education and Development</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>3066-8999</issn><eissn>3066-9006</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Technology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/RTED.2025210035</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>CO2封存方法研究进展及展望</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/RTED/1/21/10.61369/RTED.2025210035</url><author>张世豪,邓欣颖,段浩然,朱鸿亚,刘佳奕</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>21</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-10-31</published-time></date></history><abstract>CO2封存技术是应对全球气候变化、实现碳中和的关键手段，目前已形成地质封存、生物封存、水合物封存、溶解封存及矿物碳化等多种技术路径。地质封存（含咸水层、枯竭油气藏、难以开采煤层）成熟度高，适用于大规模应用：枯竭油气藏封存可结合驱油技术增收益，煤层封存能同步回收甲烷，但二者均存泄露与成本难题。生物封存依托微生物固碳，兼具环保与资源价值，却受培养条件和能耗限制。水合物封存稳定性强，仍处实验室或中试阶段；溶解封存容量大，环境影响尚不明确。当前各类技术普遍面临成本、风险及工程化瓶颈，部分依赖资源或政策。未来需聚焦技术融合、低成本一体化、全生命周期风险与生态管控，推动规模化应用，支撑全球碳中和。</abstract><keywords>CO2 封存,研究阶段,地质封存,碳中和</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1]Zitian Lin,Yangmin KuangCA1,Wuqin Li,et al. Research status and prospects of CO2 geological sequestration technology from onshore to offshore: A review[J]. Earth-Science Reviews,2024,Vol.258: 104928.[2]Na, J (Na, Jin),et al. An integrated study of fluid&amp;ndash;rock interaction in a CO2based enhanced geothermal system: A case study of Songliao Basin, China.[J]. Applied Geochemistry,2015,Vol.59(1): 166-177.[3]Buttinelli, M,Procesi,et al. The geo-database of caprock quality and deep saline aquifers distribution for geological storage of CO2 in Italy[J]. Energy,2011,Vol.36(5): 2968-2983.[4]Gregory Tarteh Mwenketishi,Hadj Benkreira,Nejat Rahmanian. A Comprehensive Review on Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Methods[J]. Energies,2023,Vol.16(24): 7971.[5]Zangeneh, H(Zangeneh, Hossein),et al. Coupled optimization of enhanced gas recovery and carbon dioxide sequestration in natural gas reservoirs: Case study in a real gas field in the south of Iran.[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,2013,Vol.17: 515-522.[6]White, D.. Monitoring CO2 storage during EOR at the Weyburn-Midale Field[J]. The Leading Edge,2009,Vol.28(7): 838.[7]Gregory Mwenketishi,Hadj Benkreira,Nejat Rahmanian. Carbo n Dioxide Sequestration Methodothologies&amp;mdash;A Review[J]. American Journal of Climate Change,2023,(4): 579-627.[8]04/02156 Selective transport of CO2, CH4, and N2 in coals: insights from modeling of experimental gas adsorption data: Cui, X. et al. Fuel, 2004, 83, (3), 293&amp;ndash;303[J]. Fuel and Energy Abstracts,2004,Vol.45(4): 296.[9]Omotilewa, Oluwafemi JohnCAa,Panja,et al. Evaluation of enhanced coalbed methane recovery and carbon dioxide sequestration potential in high volatile bituminous coal[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2021,Vol.91: 103979.[10]Parissa Mirjafari,Koorosh Asghari,Nader Mahinpey. Investigating the Application of Enzyme Carbonic Anhydrase for CO2Sequestration Purposes.[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research,2007,Vol.46(3): 921-926.&amp;nbsp;</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
