<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IED</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Economy and Development</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2995-4339</issn><eissn>2995-4355</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Technology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/IED.2024110011</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>全球ABCD 模型：面向VUCA 时代的智能战略模型构建</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/IED/2/11/10.61369/IED.2024110011</url><author>高超群</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>11</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2024-11-20</published-time></date></history><abstract>本研究提出全球ABCD模型作为应对VUCA环境挑战的创新战略管理框架。该模型独特性在于融合东方五行与道家思想，结合西方德鲁克管理理论、韩国ABCD模型、波特五力分析、复杂适应系统(CAS)、动态能力理论(DCV)、开放创新(OI)和可持续发展目标(SDGs)，构建跨文化、跨制度环境下的智能化战略管理系统。通过四大功能模块(Adaptive Agility、Benchmarking &amp;amp; Innovation、Collaborative Resilience Evolution、Dynamic Sustainability) 与中央演化自适应引擎(EAE)形成智能闭环，并辅以文化-制度适配子系统(DCIA)，实现战略管理的智能演化和自我优化。研究结果表明，该模型为企业在全球复杂环境中保持竞争力提供了创新路径。</abstract><keywords>战略管理,五行和道家思想,复杂适应系统,动态能力,全球ABCD模型</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1]Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40-49.[2]Rui, H., &amp;amp; Yip, G. S. (2008). Foreign acquisitions by Chinese firms: A strategic intent perspective. Journal of World Business, 43(2), 213-226.[3]Nonaka, I., &amp;amp; Zhu, Z. (2012). Pragmatic strategy: Eastern wisdom, global success. Cambridge University Press.[4]Holland, J. H. (2006). Studying complex adaptive systems. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 19(1), 1-8.[5]Vanpoucke, E., Vereecke, A., &amp;amp; Wetzels, M. (2014). Developing supplier integration capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of Operations Management, 32(7-8), 446-461.[6]Moon, H. C. (2016). The strategy for Korea&amp;rsquo;s economic success. New York: Oxford University Press.[7]Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.[8]Ma, L., &amp;amp; Tsui, A. S. (2015). Traditional Chinese philosophies and contemporary leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 13-24.[9]Ma, L., &amp;amp; Tsui, A. S. (2015). Traditional Chinese philosophies and contemporary leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 13-24.[109]Hongladarom, S. (2020). The Ethics of AI and Robotics: A Buddhist Viewpoint. Lanham: Lexington Books.[11]Wong, P. H., &amp;amp; Wang, X. (2021). Harmonious Technology: A Confucian Ethics of Technology. New York: Routledge.[12]Wong, P. H. (2012). Dao, Harmony and Personhood: Towards a Confucian Ethics of Technology. Philosophy &amp;amp; Technology, 25(1), 67-86.[13]Nadella, S. (2017). Hit Refresh: The Quest to Rediscover Microsoft&amp;rsquo;s Soul and Imagine a Better Future for Everyone. New York: Harper Business.[14]Nishiguchi, T., &amp;amp; Beaudet, A. (1998). The Toyota group and the Aisin fire. MIT Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 49-59.[15]Polman, P., &amp;amp; Bhattacharya, C. B. (2016). Engaging employees to create a sustainable business. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 14(4), 34-39.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
