<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">HASS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Humanities Arts and Social Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>3066-8301</issn><eissn>3066-831X</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Technology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/HASS.2025080005</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>介入时刻：导航平台如何重塑城市移动体验</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/HASS/1/8/10.61369/HASS.2025080005</url><author>仪欣然</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>8</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-10-20</published-time></date></history><abstract>随着移动技术普及，导航平台已成为城市体验的关键中介者。本研究基于Verbeek的技术中介理论，提出&amp;ldquo;介入时刻&amp;rdquo;(moments of intervention)概念，考察导航平台如何在特定时空节点中介移动体验。研究通过多模态移动民族志方法，结合穿戴式相机记录、导航界面追踪和位置数据采集，辅以深度访谈，系统分析平台介入与空间特性的互动关系。研究发现：导航介入呈现四维空间矩阵，受空间开放度与复杂度系统调节；空间转换点处形成高频介入集簇，支持边界认知重构；社会性空间对技术介入产生缓冲效应，反映环境叙事与技术叙事的协商；平台根据环境特性动态调整感官通道配置，形成空间适应型中介系统。这些发现揭示了从环境直接感知到平台中介感知的城市认知转向，同时在两个维度拓展技术中介理论：将时间框架扩展至时空框架，超越视觉中心主义实现多感官理解。研究为理解数字时代城市体验提供新视角，对导航设计与空间规划具有实践启示。</abstract><keywords>导航平台,介入时刻,移动体验</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1]Ash, J., Kitchin, R., &amp;amp; Leszczynski, A. Digital turn, digital geographies? Progress in Human Geography,2016, 42(1), 25-43.[2]Kitchin, R., &amp;amp; Dodge, M. Code/space: Software and everyday life(pp. 47-80). Mit Press.2014.[3]Humphreys, L. Mobile social networks. In Dialogues on mobile communication (pp. 143-160). Routledge.2016.[4]Adams, P. C. Geographies of media and communication I: Metaphysics of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 2016,41(3), 365-374.[5]Rose, G. Rethinking the geographies of cultural &amp;lsquo;objects&amp;rsquo; through digital technologies: Interface, network and friction. Progress in Human Geography,2016, 40(3), 334-351.[6]Sheller, M., &amp;amp; Urry, J. The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 2006,38(2), 207-226.[7]Zhang, L., &amp;amp; Long, Y. Application of wearable cameras in studying individual behaviors in built environments. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 2019,7(2), 22-37.[8]Merriman, P. Rethinking Mobile Methods. Mobilities, 2013,9(2), 167&amp;ndash;187.[9]Spinney, J. A chance to catch a breath: Using mobile video ethnography in cycling research. Mobilities, 2011,6(2), 161-182.[10]Lynch, K. The image of the city(pp.46-90). MIT Press.1960.[11]Montello, D. R. Scale and multiple psychologies of space. In A. U. Frank &amp;amp; I. Campari (Eds.),Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS (pp. 312-321). Springer.1993.[12]Lovelace, K.L., Hegarty, M., Montello, D.R. Elements of Good Route Directions in Familiar and Unfamiliar Environments. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D.M. (eds) Spatial Information Theory. Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science. COSIT 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1661. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 1999.[13]Leszczynski, A. Spatial mediation. Progress in Human Geography, 2014,39(6), 729-751.[14]Brown, B., &amp;amp; Laurier, E. Maps and journeys: An ethno-methodological investigation. Cartographica, 2005,40(3), 17-33.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
