<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">HASS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Humanities Arts and Social Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>3066-8301</issn><eissn>3066-831X</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Technology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/HASS.2025050003</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>胡塞尔符号技术学视阈下，GPT 能否成为“理想对象”？</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/HASS/1/5/10.61369/HASS.2025050003</url><author>孙嘉艺</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>5</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-07-20</published-time></date></history><abstract>大数据时常将量化的字符串解读为事实本身。围绕&amp;ldquo;人造机器-机器换人-机器造人&amp;rdquo;的讨论潜藏着通往哲学领域&amp;ldquo;理想对象&amp;rdquo;的期许与逻辑。&amp;ldquo;人造机器&amp;rdquo;阶段，人试图创造思想；&amp;ldquo;机器换人&amp;rdquo;阶段，技术迭代人的认知；&amp;ldquo;机器造人&amp;rdquo;时代，领域铸就思想。技术进程的推进，将冲突矛盾点集中在&amp;ldquo;机器与人&amp;rdquo;的危机关系上，从存在意义的角度多次发出科学性和伦理性的双重拷问。生活世界作为根基性领域，始终是科学世界存在的前提之要。人工智能正在消解人对自我本身&amp;ldquo;具身化&amp;rdquo;的认知，那么，GPT 的代偿性应用，可能意味着技术发展的新一轮&amp;ldquo;理想对象&amp;rdquo;验证到来。胡塞尔从追求理性与逻辑到向生活现象回归，其思想谱系后期在符号技术学领域不断深耕。如果人的价值是考量的最终向度，对于GPT 的考察，或许可以通过还原&amp;ldquo;理想对象&amp;rdquo;的特征进行估量。</abstract><keywords>胡塞尔现象学,符号技术学,GPT,理想对象</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1]Willard, D. (1984). Logic and the objectivity of knowledge: A study in Husserl&amp;rsquo;s early philosophy. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press.[2]Husserl, E. (2003). Philosophy of arithmetic: Psychological and logical investigations with supplementary texts from 1887-1901 (D. Willard, Trans.).Dordrecht: Kluwer.[3]Bernet, R., Kern, I. and Marbach, E. (1993). An introduction to Husserlian phenomenology. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.[4]Husserl, E. (1970a). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy (D. Carr, Trans.).Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.[5]Husserl, E. (1970b). The origin of geometry (D. Carr, Trans.). In Edmund Husserl, The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.[6]Str&amp;ouml;ker, E. (1987). Investigations in philosophy of space (A. Mickunas, Trans). Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press.[7]Husserl (1970b, p. 366). The origin of geometry (D. Carr, Trans.). In Edmund Husserl, The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.[8]Husserl, E. (1970c). Logical investigations (2 Vol.) (J. M. Findlay, Trans.). London: Routledge &amp;amp; Kegan Paul.[9] 贝尔纳&amp;middot;斯蒂格勒.《技术与时间：爱比米修斯的过失》（裴程译）. 南京: 译林出版社.[10] 周慎. 新文本间性: 生成式人工智能的文本内涵、结构与表征[J]. 新闻记 者,2023,(06):39-45.[11] 约翰&amp;middot;杜翰姆&amp;middot;彼得斯（1999/2017）:《对空言说：传播的观念史》（邓建国译）, 上海: 上海译文出版社:p34.[12] 陈永伟. 超越ChatGPT: 生成式AI 的机遇、风险与挑战[J]. 山东大学学报( 哲学社 科学版),2023(03):127-143.[13]Landahl HD, Mcculloch WS, Pitts W. A statistical consequence of the logical calculus of nervous nets. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 1943,5(4):135&amp;ndash;137.[14] 王乃钰, 叶育鑫, 刘露, 等. 基于深度学习的语言模型研究进展[J]. 软件学报,2021,32(04):1082-1115.[15] 王沐之, 胡翼青.ChatGPT 与第三交流的诞生[J/OL]. 现代出版:1-11[2023-12-19].</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
