<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ETR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Educational Theory and Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2995-3448</issn><eissn>2995-3456</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Technology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/ETR.2025370028</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>“产出导向法”视域下，讲好中华故事大学英语课程思政路径探索</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/ETR/3/37/10.61369/ETR.2025370028</url><author>张苗</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>37</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-09-12</published-time></date></history><abstract>产出导向法（Production-Oriented Approach, POA）教学理念倡导学生为主体，教师为主导，在高校英语教学中广泛运用并获得良好的教学效果。《大学英语》课程通过积累语言素材，构建思辨思维，培养学生讲好中华故事，弘扬中华文化的能力，达到全面贯彻党的教育方针、落实立德树人根本任务。本文从大学英语课程的课程定位和目标入手，分析了课程思政建设过程中出现的痛点和问题，提出对应的创新举措，希望能为高校英语课程思政建设提供参考和借鉴。</abstract><keywords>产出导向法(POA),大学英语,课程思政</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1] 王守仁. 《大学英语教学指南》要点解读[J]. 外语界, 2016, 174(03): 2-10.[2] 中华人民共和国教育部. 高等学院课程思政建设指导纲要[EB/OL]. 北京：中华人民共和国教育部, 2020, (2020-6-01)[2025-7-21]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/202006/t20200603_462437.html[3] 大学外语教育指导委员会. 大学英语教学指南[M]. 北京：高等教育出版社, 2020.[4] 文秋芳. 构建" 产出导向法" 理论体系[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2015, 47(04): 547-558+640.[5] 文秋芳. 大学外语课程思政的内涵和实施框架[J]. 中国外语, 2021,18(02): 47-52.[6]Somervell, H. . Issues in Assessment, Enterprise and Higher Education: the case for self ‐peer and collaborative assessment[J]. Assessment &amp;amp; Evaluation in Higher Education, 1993, 18(3), 221&amp;ndash;233.[7]D ittman, Dawn R; Hawkes, Mark; Deokar, Amit V; Sarnikar, Surendra. Improving virtual team collaboration outcomes through collaboration process structuring[J],Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2010,11(4): 195-210;289-290.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
