ETREducational Theory and Research2995-34482995-3456Art and Technology10.61369/ETR.2025370027Article人格内外倾向理论视域下高校学生人际交往困境的 理论分析与成长辅导策略探析https://artdesignp.com/journal/ETR/3/37/10.61369/ETR.2025370027张宁瑞,眭佳琪,罗畅,唐紫玉20253372025-09-12本研究聚焦高校学生人际交往困境问题，旨在从人格内外倾向理论视角进行理论探讨。通过系统梳理相关文献，深入分析内倾型与外倾型人格特质在人际交往中潜在的困境差异及其内在心理机制。基于此理论分析，探讨并构建具有针对性的高校学生成长辅导策略理论框架，强调辅导策略应遵循人格倾向适配性原则。本研究期望为深化理解人格因素在人际交往中的作用、指导高校心理健康教育和人际交往辅导实践提供理论依据与思路参考。人格内外倾向理论,高校学生,人际交往困境,成长辅导

[1] 卡尔·荣格. 荣格心理学[M]. 江西美术出版社:201902:652.[2] 陈少华. 人格心理学[M]. 暨南大学出版社:201812:308.[3] 钱铭怡, 武国城, 朱荣春, 等. 艾森克人格问卷简式量表中国版(EPQ-RSC) 的修订[J]. 心理学报,2000,(03):317-323.[4]Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 1992,6(4), 343–359.[5] 王笑庸. 内向型、外向型性格与合作学习模式之间的相关性研究[D]. 辽宁: 辽宁师范大学,2012. DOI:10.7666/d.Y2233897.[6] 侯玉波( 著) 社会心理学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2013.[7]M. A G .Rethinking the Extraverted Sales Ideal: The Ambivert Advantage[J].Psychological Science,2013,24(6):1024-1030.[8]Lucas RE, Le K, Dyrenforth PS. Explaining the extraversion/positive affect relation: sociability cannot account for extraverts' greater happiness. J Pers. 2008 Jun;76(3):385-414. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00490.x. Epub 2008 Apr 8. PMID: 18399958.[9]Asendorpf, J. B., & Wilpers, S. Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998,74(6), 1531–1544.[10]Roberts BW, Kuncel NR, Shiner R, Caspi A, Goldberg LR. The Power of Personality: The Comparative Validity of Personality Traits, Socioeconomic Status, and Cognitive Ability for Predicting Important Life Outcome s. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Dec;2(4):313-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1745 -6916.2007.00047.x. PMID: 26151971; PMCID: PMC4499872.