<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ETI</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Education and Teaching Innovation</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2995-4894</issn><eissn>2995-4908</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Technology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/ETI.2025080005</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>STAD 合作学习法在小学英语阅读教学中的实践研究</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/ETI/3/8/10.61369/ETI.2025080005</url><author>高亚男</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>8</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-08-20</published-time></date></history><abstract>本研究针对《义务教育英语课程标准（2022年版）》核心素养导向下，小学英语阅读教学中存在的学生参与度低、阅读策略表层化及跨文化意识培养形式化等问题，探索了STAD（学生小组成绩分工法）合作学习法的应用路径。研究通过构建异质分组与角色互赖机制（组长、汇报者、计时员、记录员协同），设计任务驱动的三层阅读活动循环（学习理解、应用实践、迁移创新逐层递进），并实施差异化评价与动态奖励机制（个体阶梯积分与小组多维互评结合），有效提升了学生的课堂参与度和协作效能。实践表明，该方法显著促进了学生文本深度理解、语言迁移运用、批判性思维及跨文化认知能力的发展，其结构化任务设计、角色互赖目标共建与反馈迭代的运行逻辑，为小学英语阅读教学提供了可复制的协作框架，契合新课标&amp;ldquo;学思结合、用创为本&amp;rdquo;的活动观要求。</abstract><keywords>STAD 合作学习法,小学英语,阅读理解</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1] 中华人民共和国教育部. 义务教育英语课程标准(2022 年版)[S]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2022.[2] 朱在红. 小学英语教学中合作学习法的应用[J]. 西部素质教育, 2019, 5(21):1.DOI:10.16681/j.cnki.wcqe.201921146.[3] 何志广. 促进小学英语教学的创新发展&amp;mdash;&amp;mdash; 浅谈小组合作学习法[J]. 广东科技,2009(12):107-108.[4] VAN DER STUYF R R. Scaffolding as a teaching strategy[J]. Adolescent Learning and Development, 2002, 52(3): 5-18.[5]RAYMOND E. Cognitive characteristics[A]//PRYSTUPA M. Learners with Mild Disabilities[M]. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn &amp;amp; Bacon, 2000: 169-201.[6]BRANSFORD J, BROWN A L, COCKING R R. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School[M]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.[7]BERZENER &amp;Uuml; A, DENEME S. The effect of cooperative learning on EFL learners&amp;rsquo; success of reading comprehension: An experimental study implementing Slavin&amp;rsquo;s STAD method[J]. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2021, 20(4): 90-100.[8]SYAKUR A, JUNINING E, SABAT Y. The effectiveness of cooperative learning (STAD and PBL type) on E-learning sustainable development in higher education[J]. Journal of Development Research, 2020, 4(1): 53-61.[9]NAZARI A. Impact of using the STAD model of cooperative learning on autonomy and attitude of Iranian secondary school EFL learners[J]. Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation, 2014, 5(2): 48-76.[10]ZHANG Y, NAIR S M, WIDER W, et al. The effects of STAD method on Chinese students&amp;rsquo; motivation in learning English communicative competence[J]. World Journal of English Language, 2022, 12(6): 1. DOI:10.5430/wjel.v12n6p1.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
