<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">EST</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Educational Science Theory</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2995-4835</issn><eissn>2995-4843</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Technology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/EST.2025050035</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>产品艺术设计基于模糊决策支持：结合 fsQCA配置洞察以提升

用户交互体验</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/EST/3/5/10.61369/EST.2025050035</url><author>史晓悦,石孔超,张鍱嘉</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>5</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-05-20</published-time></date></history><abstract>本研究探讨了文化创意产业中产品艺术设计与用户交互体验（UX）之间的复杂因果关系，认为用户体验是多种设计因素相互作用的结果。通过结合模糊决策支持与fsQCA，识别了三条实现高用户体验的路径：美学- 可用性- 情感、文化- 情感和创新- 可用性路径。研究验证了设计等效性原则，表明不同条件组合可实现相同结果，为文化创意领域的设计评估提供新框架。</abstract><keywords>模糊决策支持,fsQCA,文化创意产品设计,用户交互体验,设计配置,等效性</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1]UNCTAD. Creative Economy Outlook: Trends in international trade in creative industries. United Nations.2020.[2]Wang, C. The value and path of cultural and creative product design from the perspective of cultural communication. Journal of Landscape Research, 2020,12(4), 125-128.[3]Hassenzahl, M. User experience (UX): Towards an experiential perspective on product quality. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on l&amp;rsquo;Homme et la Machine (pp. 11-15).2008.[4]Ragin, C. C. Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.2008.[5]Rihoux, B., &amp;amp; Ragin, C. C. Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Sage Publications.2009.[6]Zhang, W., &amp;amp; Li, H. The symbolic meaning and design strategy of cultural and creative products. Packaging Engineering, 2019,40(14), 211-215.[7]Wang, J., &amp;amp; Wang, S. Research on the design of cultural and creative products based on user experience. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp.543-554). Springer.2018.[8]Norman, D. A. Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books.2004.[9]Wang, X., Chen, Y., &amp;amp; Zhang, L. Participatory design in cultural heritage preservation: Lessons from community-based creative projects. Design Issues, 2021,37(3),45-58.[10]Kumar, V., Ramachandran, D., &amp;amp; Kumar, B. The role of marketing agility in achieving sustainable competitive advantage: A fsQCA approach. Journal of Business Research,2022,139, 1420-1432.[11]Fainshmidt, S., Witt, M. A., Aguilera, R. V., &amp;amp; Verbeke, A. The contributions of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 2020,51(4), 455-466.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
