<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ERA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Engineering Research and Application</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2995-3154</issn><eissn>2993-2742</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Technology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/ERA.2026090039</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>船舶撞击桥梁研究进展综述</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/ERA/4/9/10.61369/ERA.2026090039</url><author>陈耀金,邱政男</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>9</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-09-20</published-time></date></history><abstract>&amp;nbsp;随着国内跨江、跨海桥梁大规模建设，船舶撞击已成为桥梁垮塌、结构损伤的核心诱因之一，船撞安全是通航桥梁全生命周期运维的关键研究方向。本文系统梳理国内外桥梁船撞相关研究成果，从船撞事故统计特征、船撞风险评估方法、碰撞响应分析手段三大维度展开综述，对比各类试验、数值、理论方法的适用场景与固有缺陷。综合现有研究指出当前存在多灾害耦合机理不清、等效计算方法精度不足、防撞设计规范不完善等短板，可为通航桥梁抗撞设计与防护工程提供理论参考。</abstract><keywords>桥梁船撞,风险评估,碰撞响应,有限元仿真,防撞规范</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1] JTG/T 3360-02-2020, 公路桥梁抗撞设计规范[S].[2] 樊伟,钟正午,王君杰,等.桥梁船撞研究进展综述:事故,分析与防护[J].中国公路学报, 2024, 37(5):38-66.[3] 刘建成,顾永宁.基于整船整桥模型的船桥碰撞数值仿真[J].工程力学, 2003, 20(5):8.[4] 潘晋 , 张小强,许明财,等.船-桥梁浮式钢套箱碰撞数值模拟中的流场处理方法对比研究[J].振动与冲击, 2016, 35(7):7.[5] 侯跃鹏. 桥墩在船舶撞击下的动力响应分析及防撞措施研究[D].天津大学[2026-07-10].[6] 王君杰,耿波.桥梁船撞概率风险评估与措施[M].人民交通出版社,2010.[7] 卞海丁,刘红平,魏进,李鹏程. 水平冲击作用下非新建桥梁桩基动力响应及损伤特性[J].中国公路学报,2024,37(5):222-333.[8] DB43/T 3066&amp;mdash;2024, 既有桥梁防船撞性能评估与提升设计标准[S].[9] AASHTO. Guide Specification and Commentary for VesselCollision Design of Highway Bridges[ S]. Washington D.C: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 1994.[10] C. U. Kunz. Ship Bridge Collision in River Traffic, Analysis and Design Practice [C]. Ship Collision Analysis, 1998:13-21.[11] A. C. W. M .Vrouwenvelder. Design for Ship Impact according to Eurocode 1, Part 2.7 [C]. Ship Collision Analysis, 1998:123-131.[12] 曾鹏 . 桥墩碰撞力理论与试验研究[D]. 广东工业大学, 2013.[13] 陈国虞 , 王礼立. 船撞桥及其防御[M]. 中国铁道出版社, 2006.[14] Woisin G. Collision experiments of GKSS [J]. Jahrbuch SYG, 1976.[15] Verdeveldt AW, Wevers L.J. Full scale ship collision tests[C]. Proceedings of Conference on Prediction Methodology of Tanker Structural Failure (ASIS),1992.[16] Nakamura T, Kuroiwa T. Experimental study on failure of ship&amp;rsquo;s side structure [C]. Proceedings of MARIENV&amp;rsquo;95. Tokyo, Japan, 1995, 1:130-136.[17] 唐长刚，王敏，杨黎明.船撞桥墩模型试验及分析[J].力学季刊，2010，(4)：478-484.[18] Guo J, He JX. Dynamic response analysis of ship-bridge collisions experiment [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University - Science A: Applied Physics &amp;amp; Engineering, 2020, 21(7): 525-534.[19] 汪宏 . 桥梁船撞数值模拟重力与浮力分析[D]. 重庆交通大学,2011.[20] 郑植 , 耿波,董俊宏,等.不同碰撞角度下水-船-墩流固耦合数值模拟研究[J].船舶力学, 2023, 27(4):558-572.[21] Luo G , Pan S , Zhang Y ,et al.Response Analysis of Submerged Floating Tunnel Hit by Submarine Based on Smoothed-Particle Hydrodynamics[J].Shock and Vibration, 2019.[22] Fan W , Yuan W C .Numerical simulation and analytical modeling of pile-supported structures subjected to ship collisions including soil&amp;ndash;structure interaction[J].Ocean Engineering, 2014, 91(nov.15):11-27.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
