<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">EIR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Educational Innovation and Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>3066-8298</issn><eissn>3066-828X</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Technology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/EIR.2026080027</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>英语演讲比赛：跨学科能力发展的课外路径</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/EIR/2/8/10.61369/EIR.2026080027</url><author>周坚坚</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>8</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-08-20</published-time></date></history><abstract>本研究以课堂外语言学习理论和身份认同与投资理论为框架，考察英语演讲比赛作为&amp;ldquo;外语+技能&amp;rdquo;复合型人才培养课外学习方式的运行机制。研究采用质性方法，对七名参与&amp;ldquo;外研社&amp;middot;国才杯&amp;rdquo;全国英语演讲大赛的非英语专业本科生访谈，提炼出投资驱动、专业知识整合光谱、身份转变、课外学习机制、挑战与适应策略五大主题。结果表明，参赛者的专业知识整合程度与竞赛进展呈正相关；身份转变呈现从&amp;ldquo;工具性使用&amp;rdquo;到&amp;ldquo;对话性使用&amp;rdquo;的递进；教师在降低参赛门槛方面发挥了制度化代理的关键作用。研究拓展了投资模型中&amp;ldquo;意识形态&amp;rdquo;维度的内涵，为复合型人才培养提供了实证依据。</abstract><keywords>英语演讲比赛,复合型人才培养,身份认同与投资,非英语专业本科生</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1]Benson, P. (2011a). Language learning and teaching beyond the classroom: An introduction to the field. In P. Benson &amp;amp; H. Reinders (Eds.), Beyond the language classroom (pp.7&amp;ndash;16). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.[2]Benson, P. (2011b). Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd ed.). London, UK: Pearson.[3]Benson, P. (2017). Research agenda: Language learning beyond the classroom. Language Teaching, 50(4), 553&amp;ndash;573.[4]Braun, V., &amp;amp; Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77&amp;ndash;101.[5]Coyle, D., Hood, P., &amp;amp; Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.[6]Darvin, R., &amp;amp; Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 36&amp;ndash;56.[7]D&amp;ouml;rnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.[8]Hutchinson, T., &amp;amp; Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.[9]Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation (2nd ed.). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.[10]Nunan, D., &amp;amp; Richards, J. C. (Eds.). (2015). Language learning beyond the classroom. New York, NY: Routledge.[11]Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.[12]Stoller, F. L. (2006). Establishing a theoretical foundation for project-based learning in second and foreign language contexts. In G. H. Beckett &amp;amp; P. C. Miller (Eds.),&amp;nbsp;Project-based second and foreign language education (pp. 19&amp;ndash;40). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.[13] 光明日报. (2025). 高等教育学科专业设置调整优化行动计划（2025 &amp;mdash; 2027）发布 [Higher Education Discipline and Major Setting Adjustment and Optimization Action Plan (2025&amp;ndash;2027) Released].[14] 人民日报. (2024). 加快培养复合型外语人才 [Accelerating the Cultivation of Compound Foreign Language Talents].</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
