<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">EIR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Educational Innovation and Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>3066-8298</issn><eissn>3066-828X</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Technology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/EIR.2026050014</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>产教融合共同体视域下“多语言程序设计+数字经济专项人才培养”的“四元协同”机制研究</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/EIR/2/5/10.61369/EIR.2026050014</url><author>晏发发</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>5</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-05-20</published-time></date></history><abstract>产教融合是破解数字人才供需结构性矛盾的关键路径。本文以产教融合共同体理论为分析框架，以广州理工学院&amp;ldquo;多语言程序设计+数字经济专项人才培养&amp;rdquo;实验班为案例，系统探讨了高校、企业、科研机构、行业协会四元主体在数字人才培养中的协同机制。研究发现，四元协同面临&amp;ldquo;价值共识不足、资源共享不畅、利益联结松散、责任分担模糊&amp;rdquo;四重困境。基于案例实践，本文构建了&amp;ldquo;价值共识&amp;mdash;资源共用&amp;mdash;利益共享&amp;mdash;责任共担&amp;rdquo;四维协同机制模型，并提出&amp;ldquo;制度化契约、平台化载体、项目化运作、数据化评价&amp;rdquo;四位一体的优化路径。研究为财经类高校深化产教融合、推进数字人才培养提供了理论参照与实践指引。</abstract><keywords>产教融合共同体,四元协同,多语言程序设计,数字经济专项人才培养,协同机制</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1] Zhuang T, Shi J. Engagement, determinants and challenges: a multinational systematic review of education-focused university-industry collaborations[J]. Educational Review,2022(01):1-29.[2] Vuoriainen A, Rikala P, Heilala V, et al. The six C&amp;rsquo;s of successful higher education-industry collaboration in engineering education: a systematic literature review[J].European Journal of Engineering Education,2024(01):1-25.[3] 秦甜帆, 周海涛. 新兴交叉专业融合育人的基本逻辑、实践困境与创新路径[J]. 现代大学教育,2025(01):84-91.[4] Klein J T. Interdisciplinarity: history, theory, and practice[M]. Detroit: Wayne State University Press,1990.[5] Repko A F, Szostak R, Buchberger M P. Introduction to interdisciplinary studies[M]. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications,2025.[6] Zeidan H, Rai S S, Zweekhorst M. Making sense of transdisciplinarity in education: re-visiting its conceptualisation, configuration and competencies[J]. Review of Education,2026(01):e70147.[7] Spady W G. Outcome-based education: critical issues and answers[M]. Arlington: American Association of School Administrators,1994.[8] Harden R M. Outcome-based education: the future is today[J]. Medical Teacher,2007,29(07):625-629.[9] 闫广芬, 杜剑涛, 马立超. 中国特色视域下的交叉学科：内在逻辑与建设路向[J]. 教育研究,2024(12):29-39.[10] 祝智庭, 戴岭, 姜浩哲. 学科整合教育：教育强国建设的内生新动能[J]. 中国远程教育,2025(50):3-19.[11] Visscher-Voerman J I A, Eshuis E H, Velthuis C H, et al. Enhancing interdisciplinary education: insights from a comprehensive review[J]. European Journal of Engineering Education,2025:1-25.[12] Wing J M. Computational thinking[J]. Communications of the ACM,2006,49(03):33-35.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
