<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">EIR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Educational Innovation and Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>3066-8298</issn><eissn>3066-828X</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Technology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/EIR.2025040002</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>基于智慧课程与思政融合的《无机材料物理性能》教学改革与实践探索</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/EIR/1/4/10.61369/EIR.2025040002</url><author>杨俊瑞,赵营刚,马娟娟</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>4</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-06-20</published-time></date></history><abstract>本研究以《无机材料物理性能》课程为载体，探索智慧课程与思政教育的深度融合。针对传统教学痛点，构建&amp;ldquo;知识-能力-价值&amp;rdquo;协同育人模式，依托虚拟仿真、项目式学习及大数据技术，将思政元素融入专业场景：以&amp;ldquo;芯片卡脖子&amp;rdquo;问题关联能带理论强化科技报国使命，通过古陶瓷热学性能分析提升文化自信。实践显示，学生平均分提升12.1%，案例分析得分率从65%增至82%，90%的项目体现跨学科创新，科技使命感（89%）与工程伦理意识（91%）显著增强。</abstract><keywords>智慧课程,课程思政,无机材料物理性能,教学改革,协同育人</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>&amp;nbsp;[1]王建军,李华.课程思政在工科专业中的实践路径研究.中国高等教育,2021,(12):45-49.&amp;nbsp;[2]张伟,刘洋.智慧课程建设对高校教学改革的推动作用.现代教育技术,2020,30(05):78-83.&amp;nbsp;[3]陈晓明,赵丽.虚拟仿真实验在材料科学教学中的应用探索.实验室研究与探索,2019,38(08):112-116.&amp;nbsp;[4]教育部高等教育司.新工科背景下课程思政的育人机制研究.思想理论教育导刊,2020,(06):34-38.&amp;nbsp;[5]黄磊,周敏.&amp;ldquo;双碳&amp;rdquo;战略驱动下的新能源材料教学设计.化学教育,2022,43(03):67-71.&amp;nbsp;[6]李强,王芳.基于大数据分析的精准教学模式研究.电化教育研究,2021,(04):89-94.&amp;nbsp;[7]刘志军,徐静.混合式教学在工程伦理教育中的实践.高等工程教育研究,2018,(02):55-60.&amp;nbsp;[8]Johnson,L.,Adams Becker,S.,&amp;amp;Cummins,M.NMC Horizon Report:2016 Higher Education Edition.The New Media Consortium.2016.&amp;nbsp;[9]Means,B.,Toyama,Y.,Murphy,R.,&amp;amp;Baki,M.The effectiveness of online and blended learning:A meta-analysis of the empirical literature.Teachers College Record,115(3),1-47.2013.&amp;nbsp;[10]Prince,M.Does active learning work?A review of the research.Journal of Engineering Education,2004,93(03):223-231.&amp;nbsp;[11]Dori,Y.J.,&amp;amp;Belcher,J.How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students&amp;rsquo;understanding of electromagnetism concepts?The Journal of the Learning Sciences,2005,14(02):243-279.&amp;nbsp;[12]Felder,R.M.,&amp;amp;Brent,R.Teaching and learning STEM:A practical guide.John Wiley&amp;amp;Sons.2016.&amp;nbsp;[13]Wieman,C.Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2014,111(23):8319-8320.&amp;nbsp;[14]Kolb,D.A.Experiential learning:Experience as the source of learning and development.FT Press.2014.&amp;nbsp;[15]Freeman,S.,et al.Active learning increases student performance in science,engineering,and mathematics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2014,111(23):8410-8415.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
