<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">EAE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Environment and Ecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2998-9094</issn><eissn>2998-9108</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Technology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/EAE.2026030012</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>功能微生物菌剂对设施菜地土壤次生盐渍化的改良效果及环境效应</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/EAE/3/3/10.61369/EAE.2026030012</url><author>马艳娟</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>3</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-06-20</published-time></date></history><abstract>设施菜地土壤次生盐渍化是制约设施农业可持续发展的突出障碍因子，而功能微生物菌剂作为环境友好型生物修复手段在盐渍化土壤改良中已有极好的应用前景。文章系统回顾了设施菜地土壤次生盐渍化的成因、危害及现状，继而分析了功能微生物菌剂（以植物根际促生细菌PGPR及芽孢杆菌属菌株为重点）改良盐渍化土壤的三大明确机制：盐基阳离子络合固定、细胞外聚合物促团聚体形成及根际微生物群落调控。在此基础上，从土壤理化性质改善、微生物群落重构、作物产量品质提升三个方面对改良效果做了严谨的定量分析，还对功能微生物菌剂施用的环境效应作了科学评价。已有数据表明，所选功能微生物菌剂能显著降低土壤电导率（降幅14%-53%），增加土壤大团聚体比例65%以上，作物产量提高15%-17%，同时提高有机质含量、优化微生物群落结构，带来直接而明确的正向环境效应，对功能微生物菌剂在设施农业中的应用有极好的指导意义。</abstract><keywords>功能微生物菌剂,设施菜地,次生盐渍化,土壤改良,微生物群落,环境效应</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1] 孔凡忠. 蔬菜大棚土壤盐渍化现状及改良措施[J]. 黑龙江粮食, 2025(11).[2] 宿福玥, 张辰, 熊子皓, 等. 设施栽培土壤盐渍化与酸化的成因及其防治措施研究进展[J].生态产业科学与磷氟工程, 2025, 40(5): 106-112.[3] 西安市农业技术推广中心. 设施菜地土壤次生盐渍化防控技术指导意见[N]. 中国农科新闻网, 2025-07-14.[4] 陈朵朵, 黄欣, 张钰洁, 等. 生物有机物料添加对次生盐渍化土壤理化性质及细菌群落的影响[J]. 扬州大学学报（农业与生命科学版）, 2025, 46(3): 123-131.[5]He L, Li K, Wang N, et al. Effects of microbial inoculants on soil microbial communities and enhancement of tomato yield[J]. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2025, 237: 107203[6]Peng Y Y, Zhang H, Li G H, et al. Microbial inoculum improved soil aggregate formation and increased cucumber yield in a greenhouse under secondary salinization conditions[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, 376.[7]Yang Y M, Chen Y K, Gong X F, et al. Rhizosphere regulation by three Bacillus species and tomato productivity: A feasible approach for moderately saline-alkali soil remediation[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2026, 231: 111005.[8]He Y X, Ning Z F, Cui Y S, et al. Combination of functional complementary salt-tolerant PGPR and organic amendments modulates the soil micro-environment and promotes wheat growth[J]. Agriculture, 2025, 15(24): 2558.[9] 章祖荣, 章斯斯, 徐蒋来. 菌肥对设施芹菜产量及土壤细菌群落结构的影响[J].南方农业,2023,17(09):1-5+15.[10]Liang S, Wang S N, Zhou L L, et al. Combination of biochar and functional bacteria drives the ecological improvement of saline-alkali soil[J]. Plants, 2023, 12(2): 284.[11]Zhang Y, et al. Harnessing microbial resource *Rhodopseudomonas palustris* for saline-alkaline paddy soil amelioration: key role of extracellular polymeric substances[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2026.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
