<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">CDCST</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>China Daily Chemical Science Technology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2997-7096</issn><eissn>2997-710X</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Technology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/CDCST.2026020015</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>成膜完整性对纯物理防晒SPF值的影响</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/CDCST/3/2/10.61369/CDCST.2026020015</url><author>高媛媛,高敏,陆锦平,曲向华,亓丰伟</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-06-25</published-time></date></history><abstract>研究纯物理防晒的防晒效能影响因素，制备3种复配不同氧化锌、二氧化钛含量的纯物理防晒乳样品，采用人体实验法检测不同浓度物理防晒剂对样品SPF值的影响，发现样品的SPF值并未随防晒剂浓度的增加而显著提升，通过VISIA皮肤分析仪进一步进行防晒成膜完整性的检测。实验结果表明，SPF值到一定范围后，即使不断增加粉体用量，SPF值也较难提升，通过VISIA结果看出涂布工艺对防晒成膜有影响，规范涂布工艺后，成膜完整，体内SPF值得到突破，可以看到成膜完整性才是关键。通过这一发现，对提升纯物理防晒效能及减少物理防晒剂添加有重要意义，希望为未来纯物理防晒开发提供方向。</abstract><keywords>纯物理防晒,成膜完整性,SPF 值,涂布工艺</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1]Ziglar J, Mohammad T F, Gilaberte Y, et al. Sunscreens: updates onsunscreen filters and formulations.[J]. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology&amp;amp; Photomedicine, 2025,41:e70026.[2]陈晓宇, 王灿, 于佳, 等. 二氧化钛/氧化锌复合浆料在防晒配方中的应用[J]. 日用化学工业, 2018,48(4):221-226.[3]陆徐佳, 张浩洋, 郑中博, 等. 丁基辛醇水杨酸酯在物理防晒产品中的应用研究[J]. 广东化工, 2022,49(23):112-113.[4]王敬文, 李玉清, 马守伟, 等. 玻璃珠在防晒配方中的增效性能研究[J]. 日用化学品科学, 2024,47(12):25-30.[5]薛绘, 周浩淼, 李欣航, 等. 不同抗水成膜剂在水包油防晒体系中的性能研究[J]. 日用化学品科学, 2018,41(8):29-34.[6]Addae A J, Weiss P S. Standardizing the white cast potential of sunscreenswith metal oxide ultraviolet filters[J]. Accounts of MaterialsResearch, 2024,5(4):392-399.[7]Asakura K, Kuroda A, Fujishiro M, et al. In vitro evaluation methodof UV protecting ability of sunscreens: clarifying and overcomingproblems to develop new method.[J]. Journal of Oleo Science,2024,73(2):14.[8]李诚桐, 赵华, 王敏. 化妆品功效评价( Ⅸ )&amp;mdash;&amp;mdash; 图像分析法在化妆品功效评价中的应用[J]. 日用化学工业, 2018,048(010):551-557.[9]Sohn M, Heche A, Herzog B, et al. Film thickness frequency distributionof different vehicles determines sunscreen efficacy[J]. Journal ofBiomedical Optics, 2014, 19(11):115005.[10]Pissavini M, Diffey B. The likelihood of sunburn in sunscreen usersis disproportionate to the SPF[J]. Photodermatology Photoimmunology&amp;amp; Photomedicine, 2013,29:111-115.[11]Infante V H P, Campos P M B G, Calixto L S, et al. Influence ofphysical-mechanical properties on SPF in sunscreen formulations onex vivo and in vivo skin[J]. International Journal of Pharmaceutics,2021,598.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
