<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ASDS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Statistics and Data Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>3066-8433</issn><eissn>3066-8441</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Art and Technology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61369/ASDS.2025070008</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>ESG 绩效对农林牧渔业企业融资约束的影响分析—— 以企业声誉为中介变量</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/ASDS/1/7/10.61369/ASDS.2025070008</url><author>庄丽凤,陈晓彤,黄洁洁,裴祺阳,陈永苧,陈立宇,周燕</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>7</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-09-20</published-time></date></history><abstract>在高质量发展的背景下，ESG 绩效已成为衡量企业综合实力与长期发展潜力的关键指标。本文聚焦农林牧渔业上市公司，基于信号传递、治理优化与声誉资本理论，构建&amp;ldquo;ESG&amp;mdash; 声誉&amp;mdash; 融资&amp;rdquo;分析框架，系统探讨ESG 绩效对企业融资约束的影响路径，并重点考察企业声誉的中介作用。研究选取2019&amp;mdash;2023年申银万国行业分类中102家农林牧渔类上市公司为样本，结合华政ESG 评级数据与CSMAR 数据库中的财务数据，运用因子分析法构建企业声誉指标，采用固定效应模型与中介效应检验方法进行实证分析。结果表明ESG 绩效显著缓解企业融资约束，企业声誉在二者之间发挥部分中介作用，且该缓解效应在小规模企业中更为显著。本文创新性地将ESG 表现、企业声誉与融资约束纳入统一分析框架，填补了农林牧渔行业相关研究的空白，为投资者决策和企业融资实践提供了理论支持与实践参考。</abstract><keywords>ESG 绩效,农林牧渔企业,融资约束,企业声誉,中介效应</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1]Cai, Y., Idris, N., &amp;amp; Fuzi, N. M. (2024). An Overview of Literature on ESG Performance Using Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(12), 1526&amp;ndash;1540.[2]朱紫妮. ESG表现、融资约束与企业绩效[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2024, 14(6): 180-192.[3]Khaw Y T ,Amran A ,Teoh P A .Factors influencing ESG performance: A bibliometric analysis, systematic literature review, and future research directions[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2024,448141430-.[4]Xu, S., Li, H., Chen, J., Huo, J., &amp;amp; Kuang, X. (2024). Sustainable competitiveness through ESG performance: An empirical study on corporate resilience. Journal of Competitiveness, 16(3), 53-72.[5]孙宇,辛立秋.供应链金融对中小型畜牧企业融资约束的缓解效应研究[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2023,(04):7-15+20.[6]朱柏洋.ESG表现对农业上市公司绩效的影响研究[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2023,45(01):110-122.[7]张亚连,苏昌萍.企业ESG表现对融资约束的影响研究&amp;mdash;&amp;mdash;基于信号不对称与委托代理视角[J].新疆财经,2023,(02):48-57.[8]刘树良,闫明丽.ESG表现、代理成本与融资约束&amp;mdash;&amp;mdash;基于企业生命周期的调节作用[J].工业技术经济,2024,43(12):62-72.[9]邵鹏,董小琦,马冰.ESG表现同群效应与企业融资约束缓解[J].中国环境管理,2024,16(04):44-51.[10]Andrea Bonime-Blanc. 论声誉风险，ESG 议题的环环相扣[J]. WTO 经济导刊, 2015 (1):17-17.[11]Geng L, Cui X, Nazir R, et al. How Do CSR and Perceived Ethics Enhance Corporate Reputationand Product Innovativeness?[J]. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 2022, 35(1):5131-5149.[12]Broadstock D C, Matousek R, MeyerM, et al. Does Corporate Social Responsibility Impact Firms&amp;rsquo; Innovation Capacity? The Indirect Link Between Environmental &amp;amp; Social Governance Implement ation and Innovation Performance[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2020, 119(7):99-110.[13]顾雷雷,郭建鸾,王鸿宇.企业社会责任、融资约束与企业金融化[J].金融研究,2020,(02):109-127.[14]管考磊,张蕊.企业声誉与盈余管理:有效契约观还是寻租观[J].会计研究,2019,(01):59-64.[15]刘梦昕,杜苇.企业ESG表现对企业融资约束的影响研究[J].中北大学学报(社会科学版),2025,41(01):136-143.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
